If you answer "yes" to most of these questions, please contact us to discuss how we can work together.
1. Is there a particular challenge you wish to solve?
While each of our custom programs is built from the ground up with every new partner, our material is reflective of our faculty's expertise and areas of research. Knowing the specific challenge you wish to address will help us involve the right faculty right away and create program material based on the most current research relevant to your situation.
2. Could this challenge be addressed efficiently in small teams?
We integrate action learning projects into most of our programs. Could your situation be examined sufficiently during the five days our custom programs generally require?
3. Do you have an idea of the timeframe for the program?
Our custom programs are led by MIT's most senior faculty, all of whom are world renowned researchers and widely sought after speakers and consultants. Having an approximate timetable will help us be more expeditious with your time and ours.
4. Do you know a specific person in your organization who will serve as the executive sponsor?
Each of our custom programs is a collaboration, requiring considerable commitment from both sides. In our experience with past and current corporate partners, we have found that dedicated senior-level leadership involvement throughout the program is essential to ensuring its success.
Your privacy is important to us. Please take a moment and review your MySloanExecEd profile settings by clicking on the "Edit Profile" button at the top of your MySloanExecEd profile page. Site visitors must register for the MySloanExecEd community before they are allowed to see any of your profile information, invite you to join their network, or post messages to your profile.
Within your profile settings you can choose how much or how little information you share. Your contact information will not be shared with anyone except for those who you choose to add to your network. If you choose to do so, you have the option of making your profile private inside the community. You will still be able to network with other users, comment on videos, join groups, and attend programs. If private, other members of the community will only be able to view your first name, last initial, certificate status, program days, profile views, the number of people in your network, last log in, and when you joined. If you choose to network with other users they will be able to see all portions of your profile set to "Shared" in the "Edit Profile" screen.
In the aftermath of whistleblower Edward Snowden and the ongoing press coverage of the National Security Association’s (NSA) clandestine surveillance program, the political ramifications of all of the above remain uncertain. What is apparent, however, is the immediate, collective increase in awareness of just how much data we “give away” every day online, and how that data is used by organizations—government and business alike—for their benefit.
Many business leaders and marketers are wondering how a resurgence of consumers attempting to regain their privacy will affect innovation in the global economy. While there is a clear relationship—and now a growing tension—between innovations that rely on consumer data and the protection of consumer privacy, there may be compromises to consider that are amenable to both the innovator and the consumer.
Many people today buy their household telecommunications services—house landlines, Internet access, and digital TV—in bundles. Yet go to the average telecommunications services provider’s website and you have to select which product you are inquiring about or need fixed.
From an organization’s perspective, this makes complete sense. There’s a division for phone service, a division for Internet service, and a division for television. Specialists and technicians exist in each department to help you with whatever you need. But you get one bill each month, so why can’t the company recognize you as one customer with multiple products, instead of three separate customers?
The return of manufacturing to the U.S., also referred to as the “repatriation” or “re-shoring” by American and non-American companies alike, on the surface sounds like good news for employment. However, this is not necessarily the case.
Although manufacturing output over the last 60 years has grown roughly by 3.7% annually, employment has stayed mostly flat during this time. Why does this continue to be true, even as many companies have been moving manufacturing back to the U.S. since 2010?
The U.S. is unflinching in its optimism and ability to move forward after a crisis, such as the 2008 recession. And yet the drawback to this reflex is the ability to quickly forget what landed us in the situation to begin with. As our economy recovers, we potentially risk a growing complacency and inadequate financial oversight.
Just months ago, the country of Cyprus made global headlines as their banks’ ballooning assets grew far beyond what the country could support. Losing over 4.5 billion euros, the Cyprian banks tried to repair the damage by confiscating secure deposits, affecting the assets and the trust of investors throughout Europe and Russia and causing a ripple effect of investment withdrawals. The contagious effects of this crisis are a warning of how interconnected we are, and how one failed system could halt economic recovery elsewhere.
Most of today’s leadership literature focuses on the two most popular forms of leadership: the visionary leader—the charismatic transformational leader who inspires, or the relationship leader—the mentor who has the compassion and empathy needed to form strong relationships to support their organization.
But the global business world is changing rapidly, from the top down and the bottom up. Organizations are flatter. Boundaries are more blurred. Information moves faster across all levels within an organization. This means that leaders who can innovate and move quickly—leaders who have dynamic capabilities—are more likely to succeed.