If you answer "yes" to most of these questions, please contact us to discuss how we can work together.
1. Is there a particular challenge you wish to solve?
While each of our custom programs is built from the ground up with every new partner, our material is reflective of our faculty's expertise and areas of research. Knowing the specific challenge you wish to address will help us involve the right faculty right away and create program material based on the most current research relevant to your situation.
2. Could this challenge be addressed efficiently in small teams?
We integrate action learning projects into most of our programs. Could your situation be examined sufficiently during the five days our custom programs generally require?
3. Do you have an idea of the timeframe for the program?
Our custom programs are led by MIT's most senior faculty, all of whom are world renowned researchers and widely sought after speakers and consultants. Having an approximate timetable will help us be more expeditious with your time and ours.
4. Do you know a specific person in your organization who will serve as the executive sponsor?
Each of our custom programs is a collaboration, requiring considerable commitment from both sides. In our experience with past and current corporate partners, we have found that dedicated senior-level leadership involvement throughout the program is essential to ensuring its success.
Your privacy is important to us. Please take a moment and review your MySloanExecEd profile settings by clicking on the "Edit Profile" button at the top of your MySloanExecEd profile page. Site visitors must register for the MySloanExecEd community before they are allowed to see any of your profile information, invite you to join their network, or post messages to your profile.
Within your profile settings you can choose how much or how little information you share. Your contact information will not be shared with anyone except for those who you choose to add to your network. If you choose to do so, you have the option of making your profile private inside the community. You will still be able to network with other users, comment on videos, join groups, and attend programs. If private, other members of the community will only be able to view your first name, last initial, certificate status, program days, profile views, the number of people in your network, last log in, and when you joined. If you choose to network with other users they will be able to see all portions of your profile set to "Shared" in the "Edit Profile" screen.
Google “HR” and “seat at the table” and you’ll find articles from nearly ten years ago lamenting why the human resources function does not have such a seat—in other words, it has little voice in the executive suite. Part of the reason may be how HR practitioners view themselves. The 2013 State of Talent Managers Report from New Talent Management Network found that “the modest and siloed career ambitions among those in HR suggests that we must either meaningfully shift how we grow HR talent or become comfortable having marginal impact…[as a result] talent leaders will likely develop more myopic and less strategic solutions.”
There is great potential if companies can change how they view HR—and how HR views itself. Commenting on President Obama’s plans to improve the economy by strengthening the manufacturing sector, Tom Kochan, Professor of Work and Employment Research and Engineering Systems at MIT Sloan, told HR Executive Online, “One of the most important factors in [the manufacturing industry’s] success is HR.”
When it comes to manufacturing in today’s economy, increased automation in manufacturing plants may seem like a given. Factories first opened their doors to modern industrial robots in 1961 when Unimate—a 4,000-pound (1,814-kilogram) arm attached to a giant steel drum—joined the General Motors workforce, and they have since become a mainstay of mass production. When a job is just right for a robot, productivity tends to increase dramatically.
However, not all companies are going the way of automation on the assembly line, especially when trading humans for machines goes against their brand.
The return of manufacturing to the U.S., also referred to as the “repatriation” or “re-shoring” by American and non-American companies alike, on the surface sounds like good news for employment. However, this is not necessarily the case.
Although manufacturing output over the last 60 years has grown roughly by 3.7% annually, employment has stayed mostly flat during this time. Why does this continue to be true, even as many companies have been moving manufacturing back to the U.S. since 2010?
Smart machines are everywhere we go. They’re on the plant floor manufacturing our cars, and they are in our grocery stores scanning our purchases. In the case of the iPhone and Siri, they are even in our pockets.
And that means that smart machines and robots will be taking more and more jobs. As Erik Brynjolfsson, Professor of Information Technology at MIT Sloan School of Management said on CBS’ 60 Minutes, “There are lots of examples of routine, middle-skilled jobs that are being eliminated the fastest. Those kinds of jobs are easier for our friends in the artificial intelligence community to design robots to handle them.”
But some of the developments we’ve seen in recent years indicate robots—or smart machines—will be taking not just manual jobs, but also intellectual jobs. Just take a look at Watson, IBM’s computer that played on—and won—Jeopardy! Over the course of the tournament, Watson not only came up with correct answers, but also learned why his incorrect answers are wrong. It improved at a rate faster than any human could.